The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6636•Bruce Allen Buckner v. DANIEL PORTER, York County Solicitor
22-6636Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 29, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6636
BRUCE ALLEN BUCKNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DANIEL PORTER, York County Solicitor,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 22-6637
BRUCE ALLEN BUCKNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAVID HAMILTON, York County Clerk of Court; YORK COUNTY CLERK OF
COURT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
Hill. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (0:21-cv-03873-TLW; 0:21-cv-03874-
TLW)
Submitted: November 23, 2022 Decided: December 29, 2022
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bruce Allen Buckner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Bruce Allen Buckner appeals the district court’s
orders and judgments accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his complaints. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny Buckner’s motions to clarify, for a stay, and to
vacate. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.