The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6641•Nafis Akeem-Alim Abdullah-Malik, a/k/a Akeem Abdullah Malik v. Mecklenburg County Jail Administrator
22-6641Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 1, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6641
NAFIS AKEEM-ALIM ABDULLAH-MALIK, a/k/a Akeem Abdullah Malik,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MECKLENBURG COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATOR; PARKER, Major; EDDIE
CATHY, Sheriff; BILL BEAN, Sheriff; DOES; MIKE MILLER, District Attorney;
KEVIN TOLSON, Sheriff; LORI FIELDS, Warrant Field Agent; JOHN AND JANE
DOES, Unknown Agents,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (3:21-cv-00667-MR)
Submitted: November 30, 2022 Decided: February 1, 2023
Before DIAZ and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nafis Akeem-Alim Abdullah-Malik, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nafis Akeem-Alim Abdullah-Malik appeals the district court’s order and judgment
dismissing his action without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Abdullah-Malik v. Mecklenburg Cty. Jail Adm’r,
No. 3:21-cv-00667-MR (W.D.N.C. May 5, 2022). We deny Abdullah-Malik’s motions for
stay and disclosure. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.