The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6653•United States of America v. Nathaniel Graham, a/k/a Nasty
22-6653Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 4, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6653
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
NATHANIEL GRAHAM, a/k/a Nasty,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:12-cr-00188-FDW-DSC-13)
Submitted: October 2, 2023 Decided: October 4, 2023
Before DIAZ, Chief Judge, and AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel Graham, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Graham appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s denial of
a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States v. Malone, 57 F.4th
167, 172 (4th Cir. 2023). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court
did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States
v. Graham, No. 3:12-cr-00188-FDW-DSC-13 (W.D.N.C. May 23, 2022). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.