Robert Michael Ardis v. Darlene Dickey

22-6696Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 12, 2022

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6696
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DARLENE DICKEY; WILLIAM EDDINS; SARAH HARPER-CRUTCHFIELD;
GREGORY MARCILLE; TIMOTHY REGISTER; THOMAS WILLIAMS; JANE
DOES 1-10; JOHN DOES 1-10,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (3:20-cv-01335-JMC)
Submitted: August 5, 2022 Decided: August 12, 2022
Before DIAZ, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Michael Ardis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Michael Ardis appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Ardis’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ardis v. Dickey,
No. 3:20-cv-01335-JMC (D.S.C. filed Jan. 25, 2021 & entered Jan. 26, 2021). We deny
Ardis’ motions for a stay and to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.