The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6696•Robert Michael Ardis v. Darlene Dickey
22-6696Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 12, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6696
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DARLENE DICKEY; WILLIAM EDDINS; SARAH HARPER-CRUTCHFIELD;
GREGORY MARCILLE; TIMOTHY REGISTER; THOMAS WILLIAMS; JANE
DOES 1-10; JOHN DOES 1-10,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (3:20-cv-01335-JMC)
Submitted: August 5, 2022 Decided: August 12, 2022
Before DIAZ, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Michael Ardis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Michael Ardis appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Ardis’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ardis v. Dickey,
No. 3:20-cv-01335-JMC (D.S.C. filed Jan. 25, 2021 & entered Jan. 26, 2021). We deny
Ardis’ motions for a stay and to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.