The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6700•Jerad M. Ross v. Commonwealth of Virginia
22-6700Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 21, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6700
JERAD M. ROSS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; THE VIRGINIA DEPT. OF CORR.;
HAROLD W. CLARKE; DAVID A. ROBINSON; RICK E. WHITE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (7:22-cv-00179-MFU-JCH)
Submitted: October 18, 2022 Decided: October 21, 2022
Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerad Ross, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jerad Ross appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ross
v. Virginia, No. 7:22-cv-00179-MFU-JCH (W.D. Va. June 3, 2022). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.