The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6705•United States of America v. Enerva W. Trotman, a/k/a Charles Carlos Clark
22-6705Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 2, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6705
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ENERVA W. TROTMAN, a/k/a Charles Carlos Clark,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Greenville. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (4:91-cr-00092-M-1)
Submitted: January 31, 2023 Decided: February 2, 2023
Before NIEMEYER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Enerva W. Trotman, Appellant Pro Se. Rudy E. Renfer, Assistant United States Attorney,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Enerva W. Trotman appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for a
sentence reduction and compassionate release, challenging only the denial of his
compassionate release request. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Trotman, No. 4:91-cr-00092-M-1 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 29, 2022). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.