The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6713•Deondre Montreal Russell v. U.s. Marshal
22-6713Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 29, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6713
DEONDRE MONTREAL RUSSELL,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
U.S. MARSHAL,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:21-hc-02200-M)
Submitted: October 21, 2022 Decided: November 29, 2022
Before THACKER, HARRIS, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Deondre Montreal Russell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Deondre Montreal Russell appeals the district court’s order dismissing without
prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his pretrial detention. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Specifically, Russell has not shown that
the district court erred in determining that he failed to exhaust his available remedies. See
Timms v. Johns, 627 F.3d 525, 530-31 (4th Cir. 2020) (noting in absence of extraordinary
circumstances, petitioner must exhaust alternative remedies prior to seeking a writ of
habeas corpus). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Russell v. U.S. Marshal,
No. 5:21-hc-02200-M (E.D.N.C. June 3, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.