United States of America v. Travis Travel Scott

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6719
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TRAVIS TRAVEL SCOTT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:14-cr-00178-AWA-LRL-2)
Submitted: November 17, 2022 Decided: November 23, 2022
Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Travis Travel Scott, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Travis Travel Scott appeals the district court’s order denying his counseled motion
for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) and dismissing his earlier pro
se motion as moot. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal
brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Scott’s informal brief does not challenge the basis
for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an
important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved
in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. United States v.
Scott, No. 2:14-cr-00178-AWA-LRL-2 (E.D. Va. May 31, 2022). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --