The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6721•John L. Davis v. Dr. B.n. Thakkar
22-6721Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 29, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6721
JOHN L. DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. B.N. THAKKAR,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:21-ct-03086-D)
Submitted: November 22, 2022 Decided: November 29, 2022
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John L. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Dotson Maldonado, P. Suzanne R. Walker,
YATES, MCLAMB & WEYHER, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John L. Davis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Confining our
review to the issues raised in the informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), we have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. See also Hicks v. Ferreyra, 965 F.3d 302, 310 (4th
Cir. 2020) (“It is well established that this court does not consider issues raised for the first
time on appeal, absent exceptional circumstances.” (cleaned up)). Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.