The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6726•United States of America v. Dwayne Mitchell Littlejohn, a/k/a Manson
22-6726Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 4, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6726
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DWAYNE MITCHELL LITTLEJOHN, a/k/a Manson,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (2:08-cr-00036-MR-WCM-2;
1:22-cv-00090-MR)
Submitted: November 15, 2022 Decided: January 4, 2023
Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dwayne Mitchell Littlejohn, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dwayne Mitchell Littlejohn, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order
denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. Having reviewed the record, we are
satisfied that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the petition based on
Littlejohn’s failure to establish a valid reason for his delay in seeking relief. See United
States v. Lesane, 40 F.4th 191, 196-97 (4th Cir. 2022) (stating standard of review and
explaining requirements for coram nobis relief). Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny
Littlejohn’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.