The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6728•United States of America v. Rodney Wilson
22-6728Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 23, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6728
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RODNEY WILSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Danville. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (4:03-cr-70134-NKM-3)
Submitted: November 17, 2022 Decided: November 23, 2022
Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodney Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rodney Wilson appeals the district court’s order denying Wilson’s motions to
(a) reconsider the court’s prior order granting Wilson a sentence reduction pursuant to
§ 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194; (b) reduce the
forfeiture judgment; and (c) appoint counsel. Upon review of the record, we discern no
error or abuse of discretion in the challenged rulings. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. United States v. Wilson, No. 4:03-cr-70134-NKM-3 (W.D. Va. June 3,
2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.