The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6827•Michelet Saint Louis v. MS. WOODSON, Head of Record Department; DR. TUASON, Psychiatrist; MAJOR BATEMAN
22-6827Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 29, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6827
MICHELET SAINT LOUIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MS. WOODSON, Head of Record Department; DR. TUASON, Psychiatrist;
MAJOR BATEMAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, Senior District Judge. (2:19-cv-00437-RAJ-LRL)
Submitted: November 22, 2022 Decided: November 29, 2022
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michelet Saint Louis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michelet Saint Louis appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion
for summary judgment and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to
exhaust administrative remedies. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in
the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Saint Louis’ informal brief does not
challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of
the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The
informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited
to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
We deny Saint Louis’ motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.