James David Nanney v. Erik A. Hooks

22-6834Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 23, 2022

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6834
JAMES DAVID NANNEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ERIK A. HOOKS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:19-cv-00215-MR)
Submitted: November 17, 2022 Decided: November 23, 2022
Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James David Nanney, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
James David Nanney appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to refile
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and for a change of venue. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Nanney v.
Hooks, No. 1:19-cv-00215-MR (W.D.N.C. filed July 9, 2022 & entered July 11, 2022).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.