The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6834•James David Nanney v. Erik A. Hooks
22-6834Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 23, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6834
JAMES DAVID NANNEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ERIK A. HOOKS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:19-cv-00215-MR)
Submitted: November 17, 2022 Decided: November 23, 2022
Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James David Nanney, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James David Nanney appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to refile
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and for a change of venue. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Nanney v.
Hooks, No. 1:19-cv-00215-MR (W.D.N.C. filed July 9, 2022 & entered July 11, 2022).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.