The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6845•United States of America v. Andrea Renay Padeway
22-6845Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 20, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6845
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANDREA RENAY PADEWAY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:20-cr-00233-LMB-2)
Submitted: December 15, 2022 Decided: December 20, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andrea Renay Padeway, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Andrea Renay Padeway appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for
compassionate release, brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the
First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. After
reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in
denying Padeway’s motion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (per
curiam) (stating standard of review), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Padeway, No. 1:20-cr-00233-LMB-2
(E.D. Va. July 8, 2022). We deny Padeway’s motion to amend her compassionate release
motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.