Joel Aaron Burrell v. WILLIAM J. ANDERSON, Lt. Col. Assistant Superintendent

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6870
JOEL AARON BURRELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM J. ANDERSON, Lt. Col. Assistant Superintendent; DAVID
HACKWORTH, Superintendent (previous); C. WALZ, Asst. Superintendent
(previous); A. BOYER, Sgt.; K. MURPHY, Lieutenant; BHAGIRATH, Captain; D.
SHIRLEY, Correctional Officer; JONES, Corporal; SCADD, Correctional Officer;
JANE DOE, Wellpath Employee; L. JONES, Sergeant; GREEN, (Female),
Corporal; JANE DOE, Correctional Officer; A. CASPER, Sergeant; CLARK,
Doctor; P. WESTBROOK-SCOTT, Health Service Administrator,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 22-6950
JOEL AARON BURRELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM ANDERSON, Lt. Col. Assistant Superintendent; DAVID
HACKWORTH, Superintendent (previous); C. WALZ, Asst. Superintendent
(previous); A. BOYER, Sgt.; K. MURPHY, Lieutenant; BHAGIRATH, Captain; D.
SHIRLEY, Correctional Officer; JONES, Corporal; SCADD, Correctional Officer;
JANE DOE, Wellpath Employee; L. JONES, Sergeant; GREEN, (Female),
Corporal; JANE DOE, Correctional Officer; A. CASPER, Sergeant; CLARK,
Doctor; P. WESTBROOK-SCOTT, Health Service Administrator,

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00864-TSE-TCB)
Submitted: December 15, 2022 Decided: December 20, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joel Aaron Burrell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Joel Aaron Burrell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to comply with a court
order and the court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Burrell v. Anderson, No. 1:21-cv-00864-TSE-TCB (E.D. Va. June 29,
2022; Aug. 3, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --