The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6965•United States of America v. Austin Kyle Lee, a/k/a Justin
22-6965Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 25, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6965
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
AUSTIN KYLE LEE, a/k/a Justin,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (7:18-cr-00153-FL-1)
Submitted: May 23, 2023 Decided: May 25, 2023
Before AGEE, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Austin Kyle Lee, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Austin Kyle Lee appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36
motion to correct a clerical error in his presentence report. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. See United States v. Vanderhorst, 927 F.3d 824, 826-27 (4th
Cir. 2019) (providing standard). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United
States v. Lee, No. 7:18-cr-00153-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 11, 2022). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.