The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6976•United States of America v. Peter Robert Jordan, a/k/a Pete, a/k/a Richard Mercer
22-6976Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 21, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6976
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PETER ROBERT JORDAN, a/k/a Pete, a/k/a Richard Mercer,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:04-cr-00058-HEH-1)
Submitted: March 16, 2023 Decided: March 21, 2023
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Peter Robert Jordan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Peter Jordan appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part
his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to § 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub.
L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order and deny Jordan’s motion for the
appointment of counsel. United States v. Jordan, No. 3:04-cr-00058-HEH-1 (E.D. Va.
Aug. 16, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.