The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-7035•United States of America v. Darrell T. Washington, a/k/a D-Black
22-7035Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 20, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7035
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DARRELL T. WASHINGTON, a/k/a D-Black,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District Court of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:11-cr-02064-JFA-10)
Submitted: May 18, 2023 Decided: May 22, 2023
Before NIEMEYER and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.∗
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darrell T. Washington, Appellant Pro Se. William Kenneth Witherspoon, Assistant United
States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
∗ The opinion is filed by a quorum pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Darrell T. Washington appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a
sentence reduction under § 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132
Stat. 5194, 5222. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Washington, No.
3:11-cr-02064-JFA-10 (D.S.C. Aug. 19, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.