The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-7079•United States of America v. Nikija Jackson, a/k/a Jermaine
22-7079Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 20, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7079
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
NIKIJA JACKSON, a/k/a Jermaine,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:16-cr-00069-JFA-5)
Submitted: May 18, 2023 Decided: May 22, 2023
Before NIEMEYER and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.∗
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nikija Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
∗ The opinion is filed by a quorum pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nikija Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying his third 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s order
granting or denying a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States
v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review). We have
reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. We
therefore affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Jackson, No. 3:16-cr-00069-
JFA-5 (D.S.C. Aug. 30, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.