The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-7097•Lamar Nashawn Dorsey v. Corporal Christopher Randolph
22-7097Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 22, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7097
LAMAR NASHAWN DORSEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CORPORAL CHRISTOPHER RANDOLPH,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
SOUTHWESTERN REGIONAL JAIL,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:19-cv-00608)
Submitted: February 16, 2023 Decided: February 22, 2023
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING, Circuit Judge, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Lamar Nashawn Dorsey, Appellant Pro Se. John P. Fuller and Suleiman O. Oko-ogua,
BAILEY & WYANT, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Lamar Nashawn Dorsey appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm. Dorsey v. Randolph, No. 2:19-cv-00608 (S.D.W. Va.
Aug. 30, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.