The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-7110•Michael J. Grace v. Lieutenant Cronk; Sergeant Atkinson; Officer Syner; Officer Joyner; Officer Jones
22-7110Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 29, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7110
MICHAEL J. GRACE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LIEUTENANT CRONK; SERGEANT ATKINSON; OFFICER SYNER;
OFFICER JOYNER; OFFICER JONES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:20-ct-03133-M)
Submitted: November 22, 2023 Decided: December 28, 2023
Before WYNN and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Grace, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael J. Grace appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to
Defendants on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging violations of his Fourth and Eighth
Amendment rights. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Grace v. Cronk, No. 5:20-ct-03133-M
(E.D.N.C. Sept. 7, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.