The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-7135•David Joseph Annarelli v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
22-7135Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 19, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7135
DAVID JOSEPH ANNARELLI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; KEVIN
PUNTURI, Warden, Pocahontas State Correction Center; DR. MULLINS, MD,
Pocahontas State Correction Center; M. MURPHY, Psychologist Senior, Pocahontas
State Correction Center; S. YATES, Health Authority, Pocahontas State Correction
Center; T. HEFFINGER, ADA Coordinator, Pocahontas State Correction Center;
C. SMALLING, Grievance Coordinator, Pocahontas State Correction Center; K.
CROWDER, Western Regional Ombudsman,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:20-cv-00261-EKD-JCH)
Submitted: July 28, 2023 Decided: August 21, 2023
Before GREGORY and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
David Joseph Annarelli, Appellant Pro Se. Nathan Henry Schnetzler, FRITH,
ANDERSON & PEAKE, PC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
David Joseph Annarelli appeals the district court’s order granting summary
judgment to Defendants on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Annarelli
v. Clarke, No. 7:20-cv-00261-EKD-JCH (W.D. Va. Sept. 20, 2022). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.