The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-7208•Robert Clifford Weddington v. Dfc Michael Saunders, 1114
22-7208Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 17, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7208
ROBERT CLIFFORD WEDDINGTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DFC MICHAEL SAUNDERS, #1114; DFC TOM LOTTERER, #1178; DFC JESSICA
SANDERS, #1196; DFC LEON DIXON, #1102,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:19-cv-01985-TDC)
Submitted: May 31, 2023 Decided: June 20, 2023
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judge, and FLOYD, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Clifford Weddington, Appellant Pro Se. Carl N. Zacarias, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Clifford Weddington appeals the district court’s order granting the
Defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as barred
by the statute of limitations. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Weddington v. Saunders, No. 8:19-cv-
01985-TDC (D. Md. Sept. 23, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.