The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-7226•United States of America v. Demetrios Donell McNeill
22-7226Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 20, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7226
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DEMETRIOS DONELL MCNEILL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:15-cr-00318-D-1)
Submitted: May 18, 2023 Decided: May 22, 2023
Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Demetrios Donell McNeill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Demetrios Donell McNeill appeals the district court’s order denying his fifth motion
for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) and denying his motion to
appoint counsel. We review a district court’s denial of a compassionate release motion for
abuse of discretion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. High, 997 F.3d
181, 188-91 (4th Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of explanation required for denial of
compassionate release motion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United
States v. McNeill, No. 5:15-cr-00318-D-1 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 11, 2022). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.