The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-7293•United States of America v. Omar Diaz-Rios
22-7293Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 28, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7293
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
OMAR DIAZ-RIOS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cr-00021-REP-2)
Submitted: April 25, 2023 Decided: April 28, 2023
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER, Circuit Judge, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Omar Diaz-Rios, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Omar Diaz-Rios appeals the district court’s order denying his renewed 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s denial of
a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d
326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021). Upon review of the record, we conclude that the district court
did not abuse its discretion in denying Diaz-Rios’ compassionate release motion.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Diaz-Rios, No. 3:10-cr-
00021-REP-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 25, 2022). We deny Diaz-Rios’ motions to appoint counsel.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.