The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-7317•Lamar Dorsey v. SGT. BOLEN, Correctional Officer; JOHN DOE
22-7317Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 16, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7317
LAMAR DORSEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SGT. BOLEN, Correctional Officer; JOHN DOE,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Charleston. Thomas E. Johnston, Chief District Judge. (2:21-cv-00222)
Submitted: October 31, 2023 Decided: November 16, 2023
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lamar Nashawn Dorsey, Appellant Pro Se. John P. Fuller, Suleiman O. Oko-ogua,
BAILEY & WYANT, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Lamar Dorsey appeals the district court’s order entering judgment in favor of
Defendants following a jury trial on Dorsey’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Dorsey v. Bolen, No. 2:21-cv-00222 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 19, 2022). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.