The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-7331•Melvin Lee Luckey v. GLEN JENKINS, Detective
22-7331Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 21, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7331
MELVIN LEE LUCKEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GLEN JENKINS, Detective; T. J. GOFORTH, Detective, Lieutenant; CITY OF
MONROE; BRANDON BLACKMON, State Bureau Agent; JASMINE CRUZE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (3:22-cv-00369-MR)
Submitted: March 16, 2023 Decided: March 21, 2023
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Melvin Lee Luckey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Melvin Lee Luckey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Luckey v. Jenkins, No. 3:22-cv-00369-MR (W.D.N.C. Oct. 31, 2022). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.