The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-7387•Darrell L. Goss v. JULIE J. ARMSTRONG, Charleston County Clerk of Court
22-7387Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 25, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7387
DARRELL L. GOSS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JULIE J. ARMSTRONG, Charleston County Clerk of Court; ALAN WILSON,
South Carolina Attorney General,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (2:21-cv-00900-BHH)
Submitted: April 20, 2023 Decided: April 25, 2023
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darrell L. Goss, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Darrell L. Goss appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and dismissing Goss’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil action and the court’s
order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
orders. Goss v. Armstrong, No. 2:21-cv-00900-BHH (D.S.C. Aug. 8 & Nov. 18, 2022).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.