The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-7402•Larry Blakney v. United States of America; Hartsville S.c. Police Department
22-7402Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 25, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7402
LARRY BLAKNEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; HARTSVILLE S.C. POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:22-ct-03346-D)
Submitted: April 20, 2023 Decided: April 25, 2023
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Blakney, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Larry Blakney appeals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) as frivolous his complaint brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims
Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s order. Blakney v. United States, No. 5:22-ct-03346-D (E.D.N.C. Nov.
23, 2022). We deny Blakney’s motion to appoint a guardian ad litem and dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.