The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-7411•Euphrates Bean v. DR. MELVIN JOHNSON, Doctor
22-7411Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 23, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7411
EUPHRATES BEAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. MELVIN JOHNSON, Doctor; WAYNE HANDLEY, Director/Inmate Health
Services; HEATHER RICHARDSON, Captain/Officer in Charge, Jail Operations;
T. OSTULANO, Detective, #22183NPD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Michael Stefan Nachmanoff, District Judge. (1:21-cv-01013-MSN-IDD)
Submitted: October 19, 2023 Decided: October 23, 2023
Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Euphrates Bean, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Boice Axselle, WIMBISH GENTILE
MCCRAY & ROEBER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Euphrates Bean appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to
Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to Bean’s
serious medical needs. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Bean v. Johnson, No. 1:21-cv-01013-
MSN-IDD (E.D. Va. Aug. 23, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.