The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1005•Saria Walker v. Scientific Alloys Corp.
23-1005Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 27, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1005
SARIA WALKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SCIENTIFIC ALLOYS CORP.; SPECIALTY METALS SMELTERS AND
REFINERS LLC; SPECIALTY METALS CORP.; FITE BAC TECHNOLOGY;
DARBY DENTAL SUPPLY LLC; SOFIDENT DENTAL LAB SUPPLY;
DENTAL EZ; SUREPURE CHEMETALS INC.; GPS DENTAL PRODUCTS;
MERCURY REFINING LLC; IVOCLAR VIVADENT; DENTRON;
ENGLEHAND CORP SPECIALTY METALS, Div Dental Dept.; PRECISION
INSTRUMENTS PVT LTD.; UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG
ADMINISTRATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:22-cv-04249-HMH)
Submitted: July 25, 2023 Decided: July 27, 2023
Before WYNN and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Saria Walker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Saria Walker appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and dismissing her civil action as frivolous. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Walker v.
Sci. Alloys Corp., No. 6:22-cv-04249-HMH (D.S.C. Dec. 21, 2022). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.