The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1012•Miguel Adalberto Ponce-Arbaiza v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
23-1012Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 12, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1012
MIGUEL ADALBERTO PONCE-ARBAIZA,
Petitioner,
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: December 19, 2023 Decided: January 11, 2024
Before THACKER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Robert J. Harris, Woodbridge, Virginia, for Petitioner. Brian Boynton,
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Anthony C. Payne, Assistant Director,
Kathleen Kelly Volkert, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Miguel Adalberto Ponce-Arbaiza, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for
review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to
reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and Ponce-Arbaiza’s claims and
find no abuse of discretion. See Williams v. Garland, 59 F.4th 620, 632 (4th Cir. 2023)
(stating standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See In re
Ponce-Arbaiza (B.I.A. Dec. 7, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.