The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1053•Jamaal A. Gittens v. STEVE HIGDON, Union County Judge; CHELSEY WILSON, Union County District Attorney
23-1053Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 27, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1053
JAMAAL A. GITTENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STEVE HIGDON, Union County Judge; CHELSEY WILSON, Union County
District Attorney,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:22-cv-00165-FDW-DCK)
Submitted: July 25, 2023 Decided: July 27, 2023
Before WYNN and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamaal Gittens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jamaal A. Gittens appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint
for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Gittens v. Higdon, No. 3:22-cv-00165-
FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. Jan. 10, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.