Jibril L. Ibrahim v. Vizio, Inc.

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1188
JIBRIL L. IBRAHIM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VIZIO, INC.; SELF STORAGE PLUS; HOMELAND SECURITY; MARK DOE,
DC Police Officer; PAUL DOE, Police Officer; NATE DOE, DC Police Officer;
KAREN DOE, DC Police Officer; CHIEF ROBERT CONTEE, D.C. Chief of
Police; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT OFFICE OF THE MAYOR;
OFFICE OF POLICE COMPLAINTS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:22-cv-00462-GJH)
Submitted: August 24, 2023 Decided: August 28, 2023
Before QUATTLEBAUM and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jibril Luqman Ibrahim, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Alan Sampson, SAUL EWING LLP,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee Vizio, Inc.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jibril Luqman Ibrahim appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant Vizio,
Inc.’s motion to dismiss and dismissing as frivolous Ibrahim’s complaint as to all
defendants under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). On appeal, we confine our review to the
issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Ibrahim’s informal brief
does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014)
(“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is
limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --