The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1207•Ibrahim Oudeh; Teresa Sloan-Oudeh v. Goshen Medical Center, Inc.
23-1207Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 16, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1207
IBRAHIM OUDEH; TERESA SLOAN-OUDEH,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
GOSHEN MEDICAL CENTER, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Third Party Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:22-cv-00193-D)
Submitted: September 14, 2023 Decided: September 18, 2023
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: R. Jonathan Charleston, Jose A. Coker, THE CHARLESTON GROUP,
Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellants. George J. Oliver, Stephen W. Petersen,
Jeffrey R. Whitley, FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Michael F.
Easley, Jr., United States Attorney, Neal Fowler, Assistant United States Attorney,
-- 1 of 3 --
2
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina; Joshua H.
Stein, North Carolina Attorney General, Lareena J. Phillips, Special Assistant United States
Attorney and Special Deputy Attorney General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Ibrahim Oudeh and Teresa Sloan-Oudeh appeal the district court’s order granting
Defendant’s motion to dismiss their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error in the court’s determination that the action was barred by the doctrine of
collateral estoppel. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Oudeh v. Goshen
Med. Ctr., Inc., No. 5:22-cv-00193-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 30, 2022). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.