The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1217•In re: Graham Schiff
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1217
In re: GRAHAM SCHIFF,
Plaintiff - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:23-mc-00065-JKB)
Submitted: April 27, 2023 Decided: May 15, 2023
Before THACKER and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Graham Harry Schiff, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Graham Harry Schiff seeks to appeal the district court’s order requiring him to file
all communication with the court with the clerk’s office. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Schiff seeks to appeal is neither a final
order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order; moreover, because it involves
filing procedures, it is not injunctive in nature. See, e.g., Nat’l Wildlife Fed’n v. Nat’l
Marine Fisheries Serv., 886 F.3d 803, 825 (9th Cir. 2018). Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Schiff’s motion for a stay pending appeal and to
expedite, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.