The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1292•Merceda D. Gooding v. Sykes Enterprise, Incorporated
23-1292Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 27, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1292
MERCEDA D. GOODING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SYKES ENTERPRISE, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:20-cv-03292-PX)
Submitted: February 22, 2024 Decided: February 26, 2024
Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Merceda D. Gooding, Appellant Pro Se. Anessa Abrams, FORDHARRISON LLP,
Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Merceda D. Gooding appeals the district court’s judgment denying relief on her
discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Gooding v. Sykes Enter., Inc., No.
8:20-cv-03292-PX (D. Md. Feb. 15, 2023). We deny Gooding’s motion for a transcript at
government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.