The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1355•In re: Michael Kenny Carter, a/k/a Blaze
23-1355Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 22, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1355
In re: MICHAEL KENNY CARTER, a/k/a Blaze,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. (3:17-cr-00351-JFA-1)
Submitted: May 8, 2023 Decided: June 22, 2023
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Kenny Carter, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Kenny Carter petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district
court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion to dismiss his criminal case for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to
act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied the
motion on May 2, 2023. Accordingly, because the district court has recently acted on
Carter’s motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.