In re: Siddhanth Sharma

23-1358Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 26, 2023

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1358
In re: SIDDHANTH SHARMA,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. (5:22-cv-00059-BO)
Submitted: April 24, 2023 Decided: April 26, 2023
Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Siddhanth Sharma, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Siddhanth Sharma petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court
has unduly delayed in ruling on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. He seeks an order from
this court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue delay
in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We deny Sharma’s
motion for assignment to a single circuit judge and to expedite. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.