Junius J. Joyner, Iii v. Emily B. Redman, resident of the State of Virginia

23-1375Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 18, 2024

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1375
JUNIUS J. JOYNER, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EMILY B. REDMAN, resident of the State of Virginia,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 23-1780
JUNIUS J. JOYNER, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EMILY B. REDMAN, resident of the State of Virginia,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Patricia Tolliver Giles, District Judge. (1:22-cv-00725-PTG-JFA)
Submitted: April 25, 2024 Decided: July 18, 2024

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Before WILKINSON, QUATTLEBAUM, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Junius J. Joyner, III, Appellant Pro Se. Emily Kathryn Blake, Dawn Boyce, MCGAVIN,
BOYCE, BARDOT, THORSEN & KATZ, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated cases, Junius J. Joyner, III, appeals the district court’s orders
granting Emily B. Redman’s motions to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, for a prefiling
injunction, and for monetary sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Joyner v. Prince
William Cnty. Cir. Ct., No. 1:22-cv-00725-PTG-JFA (E.D. Va. Mar. 10, 2023;
July 19, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.