The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1386•Angelo Galloway v. Mark S. Davis; Rebecca B. Smith
23-1386Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 21, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1386
ANGELO GALLOWAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARK S. DAVIS; REBECCA B. SMITH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Elizabeth W. Hanes, District Judge. (2:22-cv-00185-EWH-DEM)
Submitted: June 15, 2023 Decided: June 21, 2023
Before DIAZ, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Angelo Galloway, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Angelo Galloway appeals the district court’s orders dismissing under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of
Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)
motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error in the court’s determination that Galloway’s action was barred by judicial immunity.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders on this basis. Galloway v. Davis,
No. 2:22-cv-00185-EWH-DEM (E.D. Va. Oct. 28, 2022 & Mar. 27, 2023). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.