The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1389•Jeremy Jones v. South Atlantic Galvanizing; Rusty Williams; Brian Solois
23-1389Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 28, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1389
JEREMY JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOUTH ATLANTIC GALVANIZING; RUSTY WILLIAMS; BRIAN SOLOIS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (6:22-cv-01152-TMC)
Submitted: July 25, 2023 Decided: July 28, 2023
Before WYNN and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeremy Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Lee Sease Cluverius, Ashley Robertson Parr,
MAYNARD NEXSEN, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jeremy Jones appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s
recommendation and dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and
discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.* Jones v. S.
Atl. Galvanizing, No. 6:22-cv-01152-TMC (D.S.C., Feb. 1, 2023). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* We decline to consider Jones’ workers’ compensation retaliation claim, which he
raises for the first time on appeal. See In re Under Seal, 749 F.3d 276, 285 (4th Cir. 2014).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.