Reverend Dr. Samuel T. Whatley v. Richland County Family Court Columbia South Carolina

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1449
REVEREND DR. SAMUEL T. WHATLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RICHLAND COUNTY FAMILY COURT COLUMBIA SOUTH CAROLINA;
PHOEBE WHATLEY; MONET S. PINCUS, Family Court Judge; MICHELLE M.
HURLEY LEEVY-JOHNSON, Family Court Judge; THOMAS M. NEAL, III,
Family Court Attorney GAL; RICHARD G. WHITING, Family Court Attorney and
Family Court SCBAR Former President; KRISTIN CANNON, Family Court
Paralegal for Attorney Richard G. Whiting; KELLY B. ARNOLD, SC Assistant
Disciplinary Counsel; LARRY MEDLIN, Counselor; CHRISTIAN COUNSELING
CENTER FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH COLUMBIA SC; MARC HARARI;
JEWETT DOOLEY, Attorney; MARY MUNDY, Dutch Fork High School
Psychiatrist; DR. SOBOTOWICA, Dutch Fork High School Psychiatrist; CASSY
PASCHAL, Oak Point Elementary School; WENDY LEVINE, Attorney;
WILLIAM T. WATLINGTON; NEIGHBOR DESTROYED TREES; RICHLAND
COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT ON TRUANCY ET AL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (3:22-cv-02119-MGL)
Submitted: August 24, 2023 Decided: August 28, 2023
Before QUATTLEBAUM and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit
Judge.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel T. Whatley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Reverend Dr. Samuel T. Whatley appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing Whatley’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and
Bivens* complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Whatley v.
Richland Cnty. Fam. Ct., No. 3:22-cv-02119-MGL (D.S.C. Mar. 31, 2023). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)

-- 3 of 3 --