The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1495•Raymond Romig v. Montgomery County
23-1495Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 3, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1495
RAYMOND ROMIG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:21-cv-01475)
Submitted: September 13, 2024 Decided: October 3, 2024
Before AGEE and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: John M. Shoreman, MCFADDEN & SHOREMAN, Washington, D.C., for
Appellant. John P. Markovs, County Attorney, Edward B. Lattner, Deputy County
Attorney, Matthew H. Johnson, Associate County Attorney, Erin J. Ashbarry, Associate
County Attorney, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY, Rockville, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Romig appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. Romig v. Montgomery Cnty., No. 8:21-cv-01475-TDC
(D. Md. Mar. 31, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.