The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1552•In re: Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen
23-1552Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 15, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1552
In re: RAYMOND IDEMUDIA AIGBEKAEN,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court of Maryland at
Baltimore. James K. Bredar, Chief, District Court Judge; Stephanie A. Gallagher, District
Court Judge; J. Mark Coulson, Beth P. Gesner, Timothy J. Sullivan, Magistrate Judges.
(1:15-cr-00462-JKB-2)
Submitted: September 7, 2023 Decided: September 15, 2023
Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the
district court has unduly delayed acting on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence
reduction, his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reconsider the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255
motion, and his motion to recuse the district judge. Aigbekaen seeks an order from this
court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals
that the district court has since ruled on each of these motions. Accordingly, we deny the
mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.