The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1560•Brittany Flute v. KRISTI JOHNSON-FORD, HR Manager
23-1560Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 2, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1560
BRITTANY FLUTE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KRISTI JOHNSON-FORD, HR Manager; ADRIENE SCHIFRIEN, MLS Manager;
KAREN BRESSLER, Client Service Supervisor; MELVIN CAUTHEN, Manager
III, STD, HIV Services; KIMBERLY TOWNSEND, Head of Dennis AVE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah Lynn Boardman, District Judge. (8:22-cv-03344-DLB)
Submitted: October 31, 2023 Decided: November 2, 2023
Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brittany Flute, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Brittany Flute seeks to appeal the district court’s February 24, 2023, order
dismissing without prejudice her employment discrimination complaint for failure to
comply with the court’s prior order directing her to amend the complaint. However, after
Flute noted her appeal, the district court reopened her case and expressly rescinded its
February 24 order. The court subsequently entered a final order, but Flute did not file a
new notice of appeal. As such, there is no district court order presently before this court
for review. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See United
States v. Doe, 962 F.3d 139, 143 (4th Cir. 2020) (noting that “we have jurisdiction only
over final orders and certain interlocutory and collateral orders”). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.