The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1628•Mark A. Panowicz v. Sharon L. Hancock, in individual capacity
23-1628Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 23, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1628
MARK A. PANOWICZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHARON L. HANCOCK, in individual capacity; LISA YATES, Clerk of the Circuit
Court for Charles County (in official capacity),
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:11-cv-02417-DKC)
Submitted: October 19, 2023 Decided: October 23, 2023
Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark A. Panowicz, Appellant Pro Se. Kathryn Elizabeth Hummel, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mark A. Panowicz appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R. Civ. P.
60(b)(4)-(6), (d)(3) motions and his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend
judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s orders. Panowicz v. Hancock, No. 8:11-cv-02417-DKC (D. Md.
Apr. 28 & May 31, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.