Tamer Escander v. Christine Wormuth

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1656
TAMER ESCANDER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHRISTINE WORMUTH,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:20-cv-00589-BO)
Submitted: March 28, 2024 Decided: April 1, 2024
Before KING and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Kelly B. McClanahan, NATIONAL SECURITY COUNSELORS, Rockville,
Maryland, for Appellant. Michael F. Easley, Jr., United States Attorney, Sharon C. Wilson,
Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Tamer Escander appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in
favor of the Secretary of the Army on Escander’s discrimination and retaliation claims,
brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-
17. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. Escander v. Wormuth, No. 5:20-cv-00589-BO (E.D.N.C. June 7,
2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --