The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1698•Kerstin Lindemann-Moses, an individual v. Barbara Jackmon, an individual; CHRISTOPHER ANDRE JACKMON, an individual
23-1698Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 22, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1698
KERSTIN LINDEMANN-MOSES, an individual,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BARBARA JACKMON, an individual; CHRISTOPHER ANDRE JACKMON, an
individual,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:20-cv-00655-TDS-JEP)
Submitted: November 16, 2023 Decided: November 21, 2023
Before AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kerstin Lindemann-Moses, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Jackmon; Christopher Andre
Jackmon, Appellees Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kerstin Lindemann-Moses appeals the district court’s orders granting in part
Defendant Barbara Jackmon’s motion to dismiss and granting summary judgment in favor
of Defendants on Lindemann-Moses’ remaining civil claims. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
Lindemann-Moses v. Jackmon, No. 1:20-cv-00655-TDS-JEP (M.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2023).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.