Amanda Norris; Joseph Norris, Iii v. Safeguard Properties; Pnc Bank, N.a.

23-1736Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 10, 2025

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1736
AMANDA NORRIS; JOSEPH NORRIS, III,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES; PNC BANK, N.A.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen Lipton Hollander, Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-03315-ELH)
Submitted: March 6, 2025 Decided: April 10, 2025
Before WILKINSON and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Amanda Norris, Joseph Norris, III, Appellants Pro Se. Matthew D. Berkowitz, Kelsey
Blair Williams, CARR MALONEY, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee Safeguard
Properties. Daniel J. Tobin, BALLARD SPAHR, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee
PNC Bank, N.A.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Amanda Norris and Joseph Norris, III (“Plaintiffs”), appeal the district court’s
judgment in favor of PNC Bank, N.A., and Safeguard Properties following a jury trial on
Plaintiffs’ claims of breach of contract, trespass, and invasion of privacy. Before
addressing the merits of the appeal, we grant Plaintiffs’ motion to exceed the length
limitations for informal briefs. With respect to Plaintiffs’ motion to extend the filing time
for their informal brief and to request a transcript at government expense, we grant that
motion in part as to Plaintiffs’ request to extend the filing time and deny it in part as to
Plaintiffs’ request for a transcript. In addition, we have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Plaintiffs’ remaining pending motions, and we
affirm the district court’s judgment. Norris v. PNC Bank, N.A., No. 1:20-cv-03315-ELH
(D. Md. June 29, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.